<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What I think of Andrew Stott, the new Director of Digital Engagement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neilojwilliams.net/missioncreep/2009/andrew-stott-director-digital-engagement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neilojwilliams.net/missioncreep/2009/andrew-stott-director-digital-engagement/</link>
	<description>Trying to do too much at once</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:45:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cyberdoyle</title>
		<link>http://neilojwilliams.net/missioncreep/2009/andrew-stott-director-digital-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-1099</link>
		<dc:creator>cyberdoyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilojwilliams.net/missioncreep/?p=1717#comment-1099</guid>
		<description>I just hope he gets through to gov that there is no digital engagement without a decent connection, and future apps will demand even greater bandwidth. There is no point in having a digitally engaged government with only customers sat near exchanges. 30 million homes without the 2meg minimum now. In 2012 this country will be a laughing stock if our aspirations are set as low as a 2meg USO. The copper network is obsolete. Government think it is fine. Government think microsoft is fine. Time to get real. If Andrew is as good as you all hope then I hope he can see through the crap that BT spout. We need fibre to all the homes in the land, and as soon as possible. Fibre is cheap. BT already have ducts and wayleaves. Replace the copper with fibre, employ those out of work to do it, and then we have a true digitalbritain. Power to the people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just hope he gets through to gov that there is no digital engagement without a decent connection, and future apps will demand even greater bandwidth. There is no point in having a digitally engaged government with only customers sat near exchanges. 30 million homes without the 2meg minimum now. In 2012 this country will be a laughing stock if our aspirations are set as low as a 2meg USO. The copper network is obsolete. Government think it is fine. Government think microsoft is fine. Time to get real. If Andrew is as good as you all hope then I hope he can see through the crap that BT spout. We need fibre to all the homes in the land, and as soon as possible. Fibre is cheap. BT already have ducts and wayleaves. Replace the copper with fibre, employ those out of work to do it, and then we have a true digitalbritain. Power to the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Williams</title>
		<link>http://neilojwilliams.net/missioncreep/2009/andrew-stott-director-digital-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-1056</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 18:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilojwilliams.net/missioncreep/?p=1717#comment-1056</guid>
		<description>@Emma - I&#039;m all about those POIT recommendations. I thought the team were spot on, and yes, if AS does just what&#039;s needed to get those moving forwards without barriers and nothing more, he&#039;ll have changed a lot about the way democracy is done in this country. 

@Jamie - the idea that he didn&#039;t apply and go through the due process sounds like the very wildest of wild speculation to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Emma &#8211; I&#8217;m all about those POIT recommendations. I thought the team were spot on, and yes, if AS does just what&#8217;s needed to get those moving forwards without barriers and nothing more, he&#8217;ll have changed a lot about the way democracy is done in this country. </p>
<p>@Jamie &#8211; the idea that he didn&#8217;t apply and go through the due process sounds like the very wildest of wild speculation to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://neilojwilliams.net/missioncreep/2009/andrew-stott-director-digital-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-1055</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 16:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilojwilliams.net/missioncreep/?p=1717#comment-1055</guid>
		<description>why did Andrew Stott not apply for the job?  It seems he was quitely ushered in when no one else wanted it.  Is this within the civil service rules?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why did Andrew Stott not apply for the job?  It seems he was quitely ushered in when no one else wanted it.  Is this within the civil service rules?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s Andrew Stott! &#124; DavePress</title>
		<link>http://neilojwilliams.net/missioncreep/2009/andrew-stott-director-digital-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s Andrew Stott! &#124; DavePress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 21:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilojwilliams.net/missioncreep/?p=1717#comment-1051</guid>
		<description>[...] More views, one very positive from Harry, and another from Neil. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More views, one very positive from Harry, and another from Neil. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Stott &#8212; the new Director of Digital Engagement - Archive - The Dextrous Web</title>
		<link>http://neilojwilliams.net/missioncreep/2009/andrew-stott-director-digital-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-1050</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Stott &#8212; the new Director of Digital Engagement - Archive - The Dextrous Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 21:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilojwilliams.net/missioncreep/?p=1717#comment-1050</guid>
		<description>[...] I think Andrew is a good choice. Not who I&#8217;d have expected, but good nonetheless. As numerous people have said, he is very qualified, does have a brain the size of a planet, and has lots of experience [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I think Andrew is a good choice. Not who I&#8217;d have expected, but good nonetheless. As numerous people have said, he is very qualified, does have a brain the size of a planet, and has lots of experience [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emma Mulqueeny</title>
		<link>http://neilojwilliams.net/missioncreep/2009/andrew-stott-director-digital-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-1049</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma Mulqueeny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 20:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilojwilliams.net/missioncreep/?p=1717#comment-1049</guid>
		<description>Neil (thanks for the ping) I am still digesting the news, simply because now that someone is appointed, I can really think of this as a proper job. (does that make sense?)

We must remember that he is the director, not necessarily the doer, and certainly not the Czar or anything as ridiculous.

What I like is that the POIT peeps have a leader they know and trust and who will make sure that the recommendations they made will be worked through.

TBH, if those recommendations become a reality, and that is all Andrew makes happen... well, that is an incredible achievement and totally a giant leap forward. Um... possibly even more than that, this becomes properly embedded policy.

Must revisit those recommendations :) here you go http://poit.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/poit/category/final-recommendations/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil (thanks for the ping) I am still digesting the news, simply because now that someone is appointed, I can really think of this as a proper job. (does that make sense?)</p>
<p>We must remember that he is the director, not necessarily the doer, and certainly not the Czar or anything as ridiculous.</p>
<p>What I like is that the POIT peeps have a leader they know and trust and who will make sure that the recommendations they made will be worked through.</p>
<p>TBH, if those recommendations become a reality, and that is all Andrew makes happen&#8230; well, that is an incredible achievement and totally a giant leap forward. Um&#8230; possibly even more than that, this becomes properly embedded policy.</p>
<p>Must revisit those recommendations <img src='http://neilojwilliams.net/missioncreep/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  here you go <a href="http://poit.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/poit/category/final-recommendations/">http://poit.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/poit/category/final-recommendations/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

